follow sjbrooksyoung at http://twitter.com
« September 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
subscribe to this feed
You are not logged in. Log in
Web 2.0 and School Administrators
Wednesday, 6 September 2006
Are One-to-One Laptop Programs Justified?

Several blogs and online newsletters today mentioned an article that appeared in the Wall Street Journal on August 31, 2006. Saying no the school laptops points out several objections, particularly from parents.

"What she learned was how to play games and email her friends," says one parent. "School was one big happy gabfest."

Another parent "says having a laptop has encouraged her thirteen-year-old son to spend more time dazzling up presentations with fancy fonts instead of digging through library books. 'They need to be able to learn to research beyond what is accomplished by Googling a word or phrase.'"

Actually, I think these comments point out (once again) the fallacy of the "If you build it, they will come" approach to instructional programs. Of course kids need to be taught how to use the laptops as tools--so do their teachers and parents!

The solution is not returning the laptop, or calling a halt to one-to-one programs. Rather, the solution is in digging in there and making a firm comittment to actually using the darned things!!!

Technorati tags: , , ,


Posted by sjbrooks_young at 5:20 PM PDT
Updated: Wednesday, 6 September 2006 5:22 PM PDT

Wednesday, 6 September 2006 - 10:10 PM PDT

Name: "Dean Shareski"
Home Page: http://ideasandthoughts.org

I would also add that we've been asking the wrong questions. Instead of looking for increases in student achievement, we need to consider that the laptops are akin to pencils, desks, paper and other tools we've traditionally used to learn. There's never been any test or question about the validity of pencils. Pencils don't improve achievement. Good teaching does. Also, I'm sure in many classrooms pencils are used inappropriately but we don't question their value.

As much as I agree about our need to use the tools, I think the challenge we face is how do we use them differently. In the article you cite, it seems it's the classic case of forcing square pegs in round holes. Traditional classrooms don't suit themselves well to utilizing laptops effectively.

Helping teachers and students create new learning environments is the key. 

Thursday, 7 September 2006 - 2:30 PM PDT

Name: "Susan Brooks-Young"
Home Page: http://sjbrooks-young.com

 I'm glad you chimed in, Dean. Your comments echo what I've been thinking and writing for a long time, particularly about asking the right questions and taking a good, long look at how we approach instruction in the U.S. in general.
What I think I hear kids (and employers, for that matter) saying is that they want the tools they use in the classroom to be relevant to their lives outside school and currently the greatest digital divide they encounter is between home and school--and school is not on the winning side!
I wonder what questions Steven D. Levitt (co-author of Freakonomics) would ask? Where would you start?
"Dean Shareski" wrote:

I would also add that we've been asking the wrong questions. Instead of looking for increases in student achievement, we need to consider that the laptops are akin to pencils, desks, paper and other tools we've traditionally used to learn. There's never been any test or question about the validity of pencils. Pencils don't improve achievement. Good teaching does. Also, I'm sure in many classrooms pencils are used inappropriately but we don't question their value.

As much as I agree about our need to use the tools, I think the challenge we face is how do we use them differently. In the article you cite, it seems it's the classic case of forcing square pegs in round holes. Traditional classrooms don't suit themselves well to utilizing laptops effectively.

Helping teachers and students create new learning environments is the key.


View Latest Entries

Locations of visitors to this page